<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to pronounce &#8220;2010&#8243;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2010/01/06/how-to-pronounce-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2010/01/06/how-to-pronounce-2010/</link>
	<description>language + usage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 15:36:24 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bloodywellwrite</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2010/01/06/how-to-pronounce-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>bloodywellwrite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/?p=780#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Good question; I wish I had  definite answer. Although I have the newest AP Stylebook, my brief thumb-through hasn&#039;t turned up any mentions of the preferred pronunciation. However, I&#039;m assuming (!) that they are choosing to pronounce 2010 as &quot;twenty-ten&quot; because it follows the typical pronunciation convention of years — splitting the large number into two numbers (e.g., 1967 is &quot;nineteen sixty-seven&quot; instead of &quot;one thousand, nine hundred, sixty seven.&quot; Just my guess, but it follows convention, and that tends to be how the English language morphs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good question; I wish I had  definite answer. Although I have the newest AP Stylebook, my brief thumb-through hasn&#8217;t turned up any mentions of the preferred pronunciation. However, I&#8217;m assuming (!) that they are choosing to pronounce 2010 as &#8220;twenty-ten&#8221; because it follows the typical pronunciation convention of years — splitting the large number into two numbers (e.g., 1967 is &#8220;nineteen sixty-seven&#8221; instead of &#8220;one thousand, nine hundred, sixty seven.&#8221; Just my guess, but it follows convention, and that tends to be how the English language morphs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DensityDuck</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2010/01/06/how-to-pronounce-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>DensityDuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 05:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/?p=780#comment-670</guid>
		<description>Does the AP stylebook cite a source, or is this just a quick poll of whoever was standing nearby?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does the AP stylebook cite a source, or is this just a quick poll of whoever was standing nearby?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2010/01/06/how-to-pronounce-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/?p=780#comment-360</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it, because that is my preference! Happy New Year to you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it, because that is my preference! Happy New Year to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

