<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bloody Well Write &#187; proofreader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/tag/proofreader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com</link>
	<description>language + usage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Proofread vs. proof read vs. proof-read</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/06/29/proofread-vs-proof-read-vs-proof-read/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/06/29/proofread-vs-proof-read-vs-proof-read/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bloodywellwrite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blind proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof-reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloodywellwrite.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No contest on this one.
The term is proofread. One word. No hyphen. The same goes for other forms of the word: proofreader, proofreading.  Somehow, some way, the word gets split in two or includes a dreaded hyphen in lots of advertisements and employment requests — very uncool.
Proofreading, by the way, dates back to the 1920s. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No contest on this one.</p>
<p>The term is <em>proofread</em>. One word. No hyphen. The same goes for other forms of the word: <em>proofreader</em>, <em>proofreading</em>.  Somehow, some way, the word gets split in two or includes a dreaded hyphen in lots of advertisements and employment requests — very uncool.</p>
<div id="attachment_550" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 132px"><img class="size-full wp-image-550" title="magnifying-glass" src="http://bloodywellwrite.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/magnifying-glass.jpg" alt="It's all in the details" width="122" height="210" /><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#39;s all in the details</p></div>
<p>Proofreading, by the way, dates back to the 1920s. And what does one of these rare breeds do all day? A proofreader reads and marks corrections on a typeset document. Note that the proofreader <em>marks</em> corrections, not <em>makes</em> corrections. That job is typically left to a typesetter or designer. What kind of corrections? If you want to be literal and stick to the official job description, the proofreader only looks for typos and formatting issues on one document compared with another. Sometimes a document has nothing with which to be compared; this is called a <em>blind proof</em>. Modern-day proofreading, however, has an extended job description, which includes checking grammar and consistencies, as well as looking over copy at several stages prior to its being typeset.</p>
<p>Fun stuff, eh?</p>
<p>Happy trails!</p>
<p>SAK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/06/29/proofread-vs-proof-read-vs-proof-read/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
