<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bloody Well Write &#187; proofreading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/tag/proofreading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com</link>
	<description>language + usage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:11:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Proofread vs. proof read vs. proof-read</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/06/29/proofread-vs-proof-read-vs-proof-read/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/06/29/proofread-vs-proof-read-vs-proof-read/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bloodywellwrite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blind proof]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof reader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proof-reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloodywellwrite.com/?p=549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No contest on this one.
The term is proofread. One word. No hyphen. The same goes for other forms of the word: proofreader, proofreading.  Somehow, some way, the word gets split in two or includes a dreaded hyphen in lots of advertisements and employment requests — very uncool.
Proofreading, by the way, dates back to the 1920s. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No contest on this one.</p>
<p>The term is <em>proofread</em>. One word. No hyphen. The same goes for other forms of the word: <em>proofreader</em>, <em>proofreading</em>.  Somehow, some way, the word gets split in two or includes a dreaded hyphen in lots of advertisements and employment requests — very uncool.</p>
<div id="attachment_550" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 132px"><img class="size-full wp-image-550" title="magnifying-glass" src="http://bloodywellwrite.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/magnifying-glass.jpg" alt="It's all in the details" width="122" height="210" /><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#39;s all in the details</p></div>
<p>Proofreading, by the way, dates back to the 1920s. And what does one of these rare breeds do all day? A proofreader reads and marks corrections on a typeset document. Note that the proofreader <em>marks</em> corrections, not <em>makes</em> corrections. That job is typically left to a typesetter or designer. What kind of corrections? If you want to be literal and stick to the official job description, the proofreader only looks for typos and formatting issues on one document compared with another. Sometimes a document has nothing with which to be compared; this is called a <em>blind proof</em>. Modern-day proofreading, however, has an extended job description, which includes checking grammar and consistencies, as well as looking over copy at several stages prior to its being typeset.</p>
<p>Fun stuff, eh?</p>
<p>Happy trails!</p>
<p>SAK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/06/29/proofread-vs-proof-read-vs-proof-read/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hi</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2008/11/20/hi/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2008/11/20/hi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 19:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bloodywellwrite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AP Stylebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jajo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[punctuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jajo Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proofreading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloodywellwrite.wordpress.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK! So this is my very first word/grammar/language/writing/editing/ranting/pondering blog.
I suppose that I should mention what this blog is going to be about. The intent is to focus primarily on editing issues — nuggets I have seen throughout my career that either come up as questions time and again, bug the bejeezus out of me or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK! So this is my very first word/grammar/language/writing/editing/ranting/pondering blog.</p>
<p>I suppose that I should mention what this blog is going to be about. The intent is to focus primarily on editing issues — nuggets I have seen throughout my career that either come up as questions time and again, bug the bejeezus out of me or simply are wrong by all accounts. It will include writing issues, as well. And it sometimes will take me in an altogether different direction than initially intended. So be the beast that is blog.</p>
<p>And if you’re wondering what makes me an expert on this editing/writing topic, here’s my answer: I’m no expert. I will have an entire blog entry on self-proclaimed experts one of these days, but that’s for another day. Here’s a quick rundown of my experience: master’s degree in English, 5½ years as a proofreader/copy editor at a local ad agency, 2½ years as a marketing copywriter at Hallmark Cards, almost two years as an editor and copywriter at another ad agency and several years as a proofreader-editor at several other joints. And I, like everyone else on this planet, have a lot to learn, so I’m not an expert, per se. But I follow the <strong><span style="color:#993300;"><a title="AP Stylebook" href="http://www.apstylebook.com/" target="_blank">AP Stylebook</a></span></strong> pretty faithfully (pretty, not completely). And I gotta let out some editing steam somehow, right? So this here blog’s my virtual teapot. Toot, toot.</p>
<p>Thanks much for checking it out, and please come back to see what else is driving me nuts. I’ll be adding entries at least weekly, perhaps biweekly. And PLEASE leave comments/suggestions/inquiries on the blog. No cussing me out (for I do have control on what gets posted to the site and will have no qualms about barring any caustic replies); workable feedback is what I’m looking for. Should be interesting stuff. Now, on to the guts of this blog.</p>
<p>Happy trails!</p>
<p>SAK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2008/11/20/hi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
