<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bloody Well Write &#187; regardless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/tag/regardless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com</link>
	<description>language + usage</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 04:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Regardless vs. irregardless</title>
		<link>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/07/14/regardless-vs-irregardless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/07/14/regardless-vs-irregardless/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 15:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bloodywellwrite</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irregardless]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Merriam-Webster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regardless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloodywellwrite.com/?p=560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There’s no such word.
Isn’t that what you hear when one person uses irregardless and another person corrects the first person, saying that the correct word is regardless? Funny thing, though: According to the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, there is such a word, albeit a not-well-regarded one. Here’s what the online mother of all dictionaries has to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>There’s no such word.</em></p>
<p>Isn’t that what you hear when one person uses <em>irregardless</em> and another person corrects the first person, saying that the correct word is <em>regardless</em>? Funny thing, though: According to the <span style="color:#993300;"><strong><a title="Merriam-Webster" href="http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/irregardless" target="_blank">Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary</a></strong></span>, there <em>is</em> such a word, albeit a not-well-regarded one. Here’s what the online mother of all dictionaries has to say:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Irregardless</em> originated in dialectal American speech in the early 20th century. Its fairly widespread use in speech called it to the attention of usage commentators as early as 1927. The most frequently repeated remark about it is that “there is no such word.” There is such a word, however. It is still used primarily in speech, although it can be found from time to time in edited prose. Its reputation has not risen over the years, and it is still a long way from general acceptance. Use <em>regardless</em> instead.</p></blockquote>
<p>Aha! Since Merriam-Webster states that it is, indeed, a real word, doesn’t that give you license to use it?</p>
<div id="attachment_562" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 220px"><img class="size-full wp-image-562" title="irregardless_is_not_a_word_please_dont_use_it_tshirt-p235833548091719782qiqw_210-1" src="http://bloodywellwrite.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/irregardless_is_not_a_word_please_dont_use_it_tshirt-p235833548091719782qiqw_210-1.jpg" alt="It's not too cool for fashion, either." width="210" height="210" /><p class="wp-caption-text">It&#39;s not too cool for fashion, either</p></div>
<p>Nope. That last line — &#8220;Use <em>regardless</em> instead&#8221; — stands firm. Although plenty of folks say <em>irregardless</em>, that doesn’t make it correct. The theory of its origin is that <em>irregardless</em> is a fusion of <em>irrespective</em> and <em>regardless</em>. It probably started because someone was trying to sound smart in front of some friends and it just caught on, like a bad trend. Just a guess.</p>
<p>Regardless (ahem) of how it started, it would be very cool of you to use <em>regardless</em> instead. You’ll sound smarter if you do.</p>
<p>Happy trails!</p>
<p>SAK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bloodywellwrite.com/2009/07/14/regardless-vs-irregardless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
